Linda Fruhvirtova vs Jenna Defalco Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do they compare in second serve performance? Fruhvirtova leads with 38.84% of points won on second serves, slightly outperforming Defalco's 36.99%.
• In return games, both players are nearly even when returning second serves, with Fruhvirtova at 52.64% and Defalco at 52.44%. However, Defalco has a slight edge in first serve returns, winning 32.3% compared to Fruhvirtova's 30.81%.
• Under pressure, Fruhvirtova appears more resilient, saving 54.12% of breakpoints, significantly ahead of Defalco's 44.31%.
• Considering overall performance for the past year, Defalco leads with a win rate of 56.06%, while Fruhvirtova's win rate is 52.94%.
• Which surfaces favor each player? Fruhvirtova excels on indoor hard courts with a 59% win rate. Conversely, Defalco's best surface is outdoor hard courts, achieving a win rate of 62%.
• Regarding match level, both players most frequently compete in Challengers/ITF events, with Fruhvirtova winning 62.96% and Defalco at 57.14%.
• Opponent strength varies, as Fruhvirtova has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 200.86, compared to Defalco's average opponent rank of 367.08.
• In deciding sets, Fruhvirtova performs better, winning 55% of the time compared to Defalco's 42% success rate.
• Looking at breakpoint opportunities, Defalco has a higher conversion rate at 46.19%, whereas Fruhvirtova converts 34.91% of her chances.

Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):

The head-to-head analysis reveals intriguing insights into each player's strengths and weaknesses. While Fruhvirtova excels in saving breakpoints under pressure and performs admirably on indoor hard courts, Defalco leads in overall win percentage over the past year and holds an edge in first serve return success.

Both players demonstrate similar abilities in returning opponents' second serves, yet Defalco capitalizes more efficiently on breakpoint opportunities. Although Fruhvirtova competes against higher-ranked players, Defalco's consistent performance on outdoor hard courts makes her a competitive opponent.

Given Fruhvirtova's ability to thrive under pressure and her higher success rate in deciding sets, she appears marginally better prepared for critical moments. However, Defalco's excellent performance in converting breakpoints and recent form gives her a slight edge.

Considering these factors, Defalco's consistent overall play and efficiency in taking advantage of breakpoint opportunities make her the more likely winner in this upcoming match.